Workshops are a great thing for writers and for all artists. I have found that I have learned a lot about
myself as a writer while participating in various styles of workshops. Even if we aren’t working on a piece that I
have written, I am able to see what most readers appreciate and what they don’t
and try to incorporate that into my on work.
I think that the first workshop we had on Thursday was
probably one of the most helpful I have ever participated in. I really appreciated the structure. In previous workshops there was a serious
lack of structure. Each person involved
was trying to talk at once, and it was very difficult to get anything
constructive out of it. By giving each
person five minutes to speak and then allowing the discussion to continue was
the biggest thing for me. I was able to
listen to what other people had to say.
A lot of times, I found that I agreed with what they had to say even
though I didn’t realize it in my own analysis.
One thing that I have found to be a big problem for me in
previous workshops is that most people are afraid to give constructive criticism. Often times they simply say that a piece was ‘good’. Well that is all fine and great. You might really think the piece is
good. However, if you can’t back up your
reasoning then it does nothing to help the writer improve not only the piece
but their craft.
I do not think this was a problem with this workshop.
Everyone was willing to give true
constructive criticism. They were able
to articulate their initial feelings about the piece well, and give reasons
behind why. The why is always the most
important part, at least for me. I was
very impressed with the fact that people within the workshop did not hesitate to
talk about the problems with the piece.
Even though it is important to remember to do it in a polite and
constructive way, we as writers have to come to terms with the fact that not
everyone is going to like what we write.
Each piece is not perfect simply because it is put down on the
page. We have to be able to listen to constructive
criticism and not let it affect our egos, so to speak. I
think that this was accomplished.
As mentioned in class, the average amount of time that
people spoke about the piece was around three minutes. I do not think that it should be shortened
from five minutes. I felt I had to rush
through all the things I wanted to say to stay within the five minute
limitation (Okay, I admit that I do speak a lot so this is probably not how most
people felt). Of course the time we are expected to give
feedback is going to be reflected in the length of the piece we are critiquing,
I think that five minutes is a perfect time.
I would really hate to see that change.
In short, I got a lot of out the workshop on Thursday. I would like to see this structure
continue. I would like to see people be even
more willing to give constructive criticism.
I treat other writers the way I want them to treat me. I think that it is important for us to
remember that we are not attacking the person, but simply giving feedback. This feedback is not given to be mean or
cruel, but to help. Art is something that
we can always improve on. Workshops are
a way for artists to do that. I think
that the environment set up within the classroom gave a safe and constructive
outlet for that.
Phew! I'm glad you liked the structure of the workshop and I agree that it went really well. You are really good at giving verbal feedback!
ReplyDelete